Before
the TurboBookSnob can go any further, she must comment on the glaring
set of typos at the beginning of this novel. On the first page,
the narrator refers to “ Marlborough ” cigarettes, while mere pages
later, the word is spelled “Marlboro.” As distracting as this apparent
lack of editing is, the TurboBookSnob will attempt to ignore this
and consider the novel's merit without this error.
In fact,
John Berger occupies one of the more scandalous spots in the Man
Booker Prize's history. When he won the award for his novel G
in 1972, he wanted to refuse the honor, and instead of keeping
the money, he reportedly donated all of it to the Black Panthers.
Politics has always been in his nature.
His
newest novel is tender and political at the same time. It has garnered
the highest praise from one of his fellow Booker politicos, the
brilliantly driven Arundhati
Roy, who won the prize for The
God of Small Things in 1997. Roy writes about From
A to X:
“John
Berger has given us an exquisite thing. This is a book of controlled
rage sculpted with tools of tenderness and a searing political
vision. Everything he writes about is profound, precise and invoiced:
Liberty and the lack of it, hope and the lack of it, power and
the lack of it, love and the terrible yearning that takes its
place when the loved one has been taken away.”
The
other hint that From
A to X has a political message comes from Berger's publisher
– Verso Books claims to
be “the largest English-language radical publisher in the world.”
The
novel is written in the form of letters, written by A'ida, a woman
living in a small village called Sucrat in an unnamed country savaged
by war. She produces a one way correspondence with her lover, Xavier,
throughout his lengthy stay in prison (two life sentences). The
narrator, also called John Berger, together with a person named
R “recuperates” these letters and presents them in the order in
which they were stored in Xavier's cell, which may or may not be
chronological. At times, Xavier uses the backs of these letters
to record his thoughts, emotions, and political frustrations, and
these jottings are included with the respective letters from A'ida.
Together, they depict the savagery of war and the enduring beauty
of a love separated, yet inextricably bound together.
A'ida's
writing is complex, at times depicting everyday occurrences in her
village and her interactions with her neighbours, an attempt to
normalize everyday existence for her lover. At other times, she
recounts anecdotes from her life with Xavier as if to emblazon their
shared history upon his memory. Often, she plays the philosopher
and writes with uncanny wisdom and simple elegance.
“There's
such a difference between hope and expectation. At first I believed
it was a question of duration, that hope was awaiting something
further away. I was wrong. Expectation belongs to the body, whereas
hope belongs to the soul. That's the difference. The two converse
and excite or console each other but the dream of each one is
different.”
Xavier's
notes cover everything from his thoughts about America, to the availability
of potable water in Third World countries, to the price of gold
per ounce:
“1,000
million people do not have access to drinking water. In some areas
of Brazil 1 litre of drinking water costs more to buy on the street
than 1 litre of milk, in Venezuela more than 1 litre of petrol.
At the same time it is planned that two pulp-paper mills, owned
by Bothia and Ence, are going to use 86 million litres of water
per day, taken from the Uruguay River .”
He also
quotes people like Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez:
“After
almost 200 years we can say that the USA was designed to fill
the entire world with poverty—whilst giving it the name of Freedom.
The United States empire is the greatest threat which exists in
the world today…”
The
combination of the lovers' two voices is powerful and familiar,
and wholly relevant to modern times.
One
of the stories A'ida relates originates from an encounter with a
music teacher named Manda, and provides insight into the title of
the novel, From
A to X:
“In
the beginning, she said, there were two names, no more, a name
for women and a name for men. Quickly from each of the two shot
out others which were variants, versions, of the first one. As
time went by, the names given to people across the entire world,
became more ingenious and more various, until most of them no
longer recognised one another. Yet, unlike other words, people's
names, however strange-sounding and unfamiliar, possess, whenever
we hear or pronounce them, a common sound. It's not in the syllables,
it's not A'ida. It's not Karim. It's not Shasno. It's not Ybarra.
The sound is something that surrounds the names.
Manda
shut her eyes and went on talking. The sound comes, I believe,
from their velocity. Velocity is like a name, isn't she? All the
world's names are rushing at the speed of light to converge on
their point of origin, or else they are advancing at the speed
of light to disintegrate into particles smaller than electromagnetic
photons… I'm not sure which, but it doesn't matter. All that matters
is that names are not like other words. That's why I'm learning
the lute.
Ah!
The music teacher!
From
my name to your name.
From
A'ida to Xavier.”
From
A to X. Love advancing at the speed of light, smaller than electromagnetic
photons, able to cross vast distances, real and imagined, from a
ravaged village through the bars of a prison cell.
For
all of its quiet beauty and its earnest moral compass, the novel
requires a certain indulgence on the part of the reader. The concept
is not a new one, and Berger utilizes every opportunity for his
characters to display weighty insights. The lack of specificity
is reminiscent of the annoying anonymity of Thomas Keneally's The
Tyrant's Novel, a book that managed to be about Iraq and Saddam
Hussein without naming either. The political bent of this novel
exists more in the notes of Xavier than it does in descriptions
of the country, the war, the oppression, or even the exact cause
that A'ida and Xavier are fighting.
And
yet this novel is successful and moving in ways that Keneally's
novel is not, and this is because it possesses that certain special
“something,” an unmistakable and mysterious quality the elevates
From
A to X to a sum much greater than its individual parts. It should
secure a spot on the Man Booker Prize shortlist for 2008, and the
TurboBookSnob believes that it stands a chance to win.
|